PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LZ vs. ^SP500TR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LZ and ^SP500TR is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

LZ vs. ^SP500TR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LegalZoom.com, Inc. (LZ) and S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
48.50%
9.72%
LZ
^SP500TR

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LZ:

-0.21

^SP500TR:

1.97

Sortino Ratio

LZ:

0.08

^SP500TR:

2.64

Omega Ratio

LZ:

1.01

^SP500TR:

1.36

Calmar Ratio

LZ:

-0.13

^SP500TR:

2.98

Martin Ratio

LZ:

-0.28

^SP500TR:

12.34

Ulcer Index

LZ:

39.53%

^SP500TR:

2.04%

Daily Std Dev

LZ:

53.26%

^SP500TR:

12.79%

Max Drawdown

LZ:

-86.02%

^SP500TR:

-55.25%

Current Drawdown

LZ:

-76.96%

^SP500TR:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LZ achieves a 22.24% return, which is significantly higher than ^SP500TR's 4.11% return.


LZ

YTD

22.24%

1M

11.95%

6M

48.54%

1Y

-13.15%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

^SP500TR

YTD

4.11%

1M

2.06%

6M

9.72%

1Y

23.79%

5Y*

14.38%

10Y*

13.29%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LZ vs. ^SP500TR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LZ is 3535
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LZ is 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LZ is 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LZ is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LZ is 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LZ is 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

^SP500TR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^SP500TR is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^SP500TR is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^SP500TR is 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^SP500TR is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^SP500TR is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^SP500TR is 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LZ vs. ^SP500TR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LegalZoom.com, Inc. (LZ) and S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LZ, currently valued at -0.21, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.00-0.211.97
The chart of Sortino ratio for LZ, currently valued at 0.08, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.082.64
The chart of Omega ratio for LZ, currently valued at 1.01, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.011.36
The chart of Calmar ratio for LZ, currently valued at -0.13, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.132.98
The chart of Martin ratio for LZ, currently valued at -0.28, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.2812.34
LZ
^SP500TR

The current LZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the ^SP500TR Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LZ and ^SP500TR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.21
1.97
LZ
^SP500TR

Drawdowns

LZ vs. ^SP500TR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LZ drawdown since its inception was -86.02%, which is greater than ^SP500TR's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LZ and ^SP500TR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-76.96%
0
LZ
^SP500TR

Volatility

LZ vs. ^SP500TR - Volatility Comparison

LegalZoom.com, Inc. (LZ) has a higher volatility of 9.35% compared to S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR) at 3.21%. This indicates that LZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^SP500TR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
9.35%
3.21%
LZ
^SP500TR
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab